Will Feeds Kill Newsletters Within A Year?

I certainly hope so. Otherwise "this Globe & Mail article":http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/v4/sub/MarketingPage?user_URL=http://www.globetechnology.com%2Fservlet%2Fstory%2FRTGAM.20030925.gttwrsss25%2FBNStory%2FTechnology%2F&ord=18667536&brand=globetechnology&redirect_reason=2&denial_reasons=none&force_login=false (paid access only now) will make "Chris Pirillo":http://chris.pirillo.com/ and me look a bit silly.

(Interestingly enough, two years later, Tessa Wegert who interviewed us for the Globe article is writing for One Degree.) Here's a snippet: bq.. What does RSS mean to the content-rich e-newsletter industry? About three months ago, Ken Schafer, president of the Toronto-based Internet consultancy Schafer Group and a founder of The Association for Internet Marketing and Sales (AIMS), simultaneously launched an e-newsletter and added an RSS feed to his company's blog. Though it's difficult to determine exactly how many RSS users subscribe to a feed -- marketers cite this as one of the few limitations of the system -- he estimates that there are about 10 times as many people viewing his feed as the e-newsletter. Mr. Schafer credits the concept behind RSS with the popularity of the program among his subscribers. '[RSS] feeds give the control back to the reader.' As Internet content publishers, both Mr. Pirillo and Mr. Schafer believe that RSS could replace the need for e-newsletters. 'It gives us everything we wanted from e-mail newsletters, and everything spam has taken away,' Mr. Schafer says. 'I would be surprised if in three years there are any e-newsletters left.' p. Well Chris (and the rest of you), do you think we'll see the demise of e-mail newsletters (not all e-mail) in the near future?